comics and initials
Nov. 24th, 2006 02:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
abigailbradystarted reading comic adaption of Anita Blake (another regular series, eep, this is now up to 7 or something now. oh dear). very pretty. i want one!
also reading Transmetropolitan. like. feel no desire to have a spider jerusalem, though.
There is a currently a vast debate raging in Star Trek fandom, about whether to change Kirk's middle initial. In the pilot episode, "Where No Man Has Gone Before", a gravestone clearly shows his middle initial as "R". But as any fool knows, it is "Captain James T. Kirk of the Starship Enterprise". The folks who are doing remastered SFX can fix this, no problem, but they're not sure they want to. My solution: change it to "X". "James X. Kirk" sounds so much more spacey, does it not? Also, on a gravestone it is a pun!
The real question is, will they be able to make a more realistic looking CGI toupee for the movies?
also reading Transmetropolitan. like. feel no desire to have a spider jerusalem, though.
There is a currently a vast debate raging in Star Trek fandom, about whether to change Kirk's middle initial. In the pilot episode, "Where No Man Has Gone Before", a gravestone clearly shows his middle initial as "R". But as any fool knows, it is "Captain James T. Kirk of the Starship Enterprise". The folks who are doing remastered SFX can fix this, no problem, but they're not sure they want to. My solution: change it to "X". "James X. Kirk" sounds so much more spacey, does it not? Also, on a gravestone it is a pun!
The real question is, will they be able to make a more realistic looking CGI toupee for the movies?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 03:50 pm (UTC)"To oldly go..."
no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 03:53 pm (UTC)nah, <star trek pedant hat>they aged ok according to the timeline. TOS was set 300 years after it was aired, so was Star Trek IV and Star Trek VI. They are too old in I and V, and mildly too young in II and II.