Abigail Brady (
abigailbrady) wrote2006-01-03 09:26 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
reviews: King Kong & Watchmen
King Kong was good. It manages to also, almost as an afterthought, be a better Jurassic Park than Jursassic Park was. Although I'm not sure it really deserves to be 187 minutes. Only bit about it that felt wrong was the very ending - where was the massive crater?
Also, Superman trailer woo!
Also located Watchmen and read it quite quickly. I'd been aware of this before obviously, but somehow the "as if superheroes were real but [bar Manhattan] didn't have superpowers" bit had somehow passed me by. This was good as it makes Rising Stars much less an unnecessary duplication of Watchmen. Caused me to think a lot about right and wrong and suchforth. I'll have to do some writing about this sometime, try to figure out what I really think.
no subject
no subject
--
As far as I know, one the main ideas of Watchmen were "would government tolerate de facto vigilantism" because that's what an average superhero is doing - hunting criminals without law enforcement credentials. As for Manhattan - would a real superhuman even be concerned with mere mortals?
no subject
no subject
I just re-read Watchmen. It always leaves me not quite sure what I think, too.
no subject
Think I'm going to read some Miller stuff next.
no subject
PS The original King Kong does gloss over how they actually got Kong on the boat.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Probably not evil.
Of course, then we reach the problem of what defines evil - which is at the heart of Watchmen. What was Adrian Veidt's greatest crime? Millions of instant deaths? Madness for thousands more? Giving hundreds cancer? Making Jon believe he'd given them all cancer? He did it all to save the world, after all... and it worked. Perhaps Veidt's real sin is hubris. Jon left for Mars, he says, because Laurie left him - Veidt had no control over that. Even now, Rorschach's journal exposes the story, should it be found. Veidt was lucky. Brilliant, but his plan depended and still depends on luck.
Rorschach - did he finally compromise? He must have known he wouldn't be allowed to leave with the attitude he took. Perhaps he knew he couldn't live with keeping the secret, so he chose not to. As I recall - I don't have the book to hand - he's the only one who cries for all the dead and mad and injured.
no subject
PJs King Kong also = Yay.
Superman Trailer though...me no likey.
(http://www.livejournal.com/users/darkstream/193983.html?nc=11)
KING KONG
SKATING MONKEY??!
*shakes head in disbelief*
Re: KING KONG
Deprived upbringing
It was my first contact with Alan Moore: I've never been quite the same since.
Re: Deprived upbringing
Re: Deprived upbringing
There was a whole YEAR between issue 11 and the last issue 12!
That was one hell of a wait.
Re-read it so many times now.
Worth reading the text chapters too.
Have you got around to League of Extraordinary Gentlemen yet?
By the way.
Hello
I'm Crys (Marvo)
May I join you? :)
Re: Deprived upbringing
If you like. Um, I'm Abi. As you may have guessed.
Re: Deprived upbringing